What Countries Are Doing to Protect against Climate-Related Loss and Damage
Several national and regional initiatives address the risks of loss and damage associated with climate change impacts.
To date, there is no formal international funding mechanism for climate-related loss and damage. These are climate change impacts that cannot be prevented by mitigation and adaptation efforts. Therefore, countries need a line of defense both at the national and regional levels to help the most vulnerable populations.
Some governments have opted to deploy funds from their national budget, while others have also resorted to more complex financial instruments, such as risk transfer schemes. Regional initiatives in Africa, the Caribbean and the Pacific are based on risk pooling schemes.
The Philippine Survival Fund was created through a law enacted in 2012 to finance climate change adaptation projects by local governments and accredited community organizations. However, initiatives that address the risk of loss and damage associated with climate change impacts may also qualify. Eligible projects are land and water resources management, agriculture and fisheries, and health-related projects, among others. In addition, the fund may be used to support early warning systems for climate-related hazards, and help with preventive measures, planning, preparedness and management, including contingency planning for droughts and floods. It can also serve as a guarantee for the risk insurance needs of farmers, agricultural workers, and other stakeholders.
The government set aside one billion pesos (nearly $20 million) for the fund from the national budget. However, only local government units in provinces and municipalities with high poverty incidence, high exposure to climate risks, and with biodiversity resources that can potentially be endangered by extreme weather events can access the fund. Moreover, only community organizations with good track record in the area, and that can show expertise in financial management can access the fund.
The Fund for Natural Disasters (FONDEN) was created in 1996 to improve the government’s readiness in dealing with disaster losses, including those caused by climate events. It is funded from the national budget.
FONDEN can finance emergency response and disaster relief initiatives as well as expenditures to restore infrastructure damaged by disasters. For example, it can finance the reconstruction of public infrastructure and low-income housing, as well as the restoration of natural resources and protected areas, such as forests, rivers, and lagoons.
Mexico has other funds as well. A natural disaster fund, dubbed FAPACC, helps farmers rehabilitate their farms after droughts, floods, and heavy rains, among others. The CADENA fund covers crops and livestock destroyed by disasters.
Mexico did not just rely on funding from the federal budget. In 2006, it issued the first sovereign catastrophe bond and demonstrated that it was a feasible risk transfer solution. It has since returned to the catastrophe bond market in 2009 and again in 2012.
The African Risk Capacity (ARC) project is a pan-African contingency funding mechanism that also functions as a risk pooling facility. It was established in 2012 as a Specialized Agency of the African Union to help member states better plan and prepare for, and respond to extreme weather events and natural disasters through an insurance risk pool that gives access to funds immediately after a disaster. This helps avoid straining national budgets or exhausting aid from donors.
Preliminary findings show countries save up to 50% by joining the insurance risk pool instead of opting for individual coverage. The natural diversification of weather risk across Africa reduces risk exposure as droughts or other climate events are not likely to affect all members at the same time.
ARC uses a parametric-based insurance system, which means payouts are immediately made when weather thresholds are exceeded, such as insufficient or excessive rains. Each country gets a maximum coverage of $30 million per season for drought that occurs once in 5 years or less. To become a member, countries must have contingency plans that detail how the payouts will be used in the event of a disaster.
ARC aims to insure 150 million people in Africa by 2020 with $1.5 billion to $2 billion in coverage across 30 countries.
Launched in 2007, the Caribbean Catastrophe Risk Insurance Facility is the world’s first multi-country risk pool providing parametric insurance. The facility was designed to limit the financial impact of natural catastrophes, including extreme weather events. Now, it is formally known as CCRIF SPC after it was restructured into a segregated portfolio company (SPC) in 2014 to pave the way for new products and geographic areas.
The payouts can be used to cover the salaries of key emergency personnel; repair critical infrastructure (e.g., roads, bridges); make improvements to critical infrastructure (e.g., drainage); institute mitigation measures (e.g., install meteorological data collection equipment); and provide general budget support, among others.
The facility offers members coverage against earthquakes, tropical cyclones, and excessive rainfall. It also uses a parametric insurance system. Triggers can be based on rainfall volume, ground shaking for earthquakes, and wind speed or storm speed for cyclones.
CCRIF offers immediate relief to disaster-stricken members. It makes payouts within 14 days after an event. Since 2007, it has made 22 payouts to 10 member states, totaling approximately $69 million.
The Pacific Catastrophe Risk Insurance Pilot was launched in 2013 to test risk transfer arrangements for participating countries. The pilot used parametric triggers, such as cyclone intensity or earthquake magnitude to determine payouts. The pilot was part of the Pacific Catastrophe Risk Assessment and Financing Initiative of the World Bank, the Secretariat of the Pacific Community, and the Asian Development Bank, with funding support from Japan, the World Bank’s Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery, and the European Union.
The pilot ended in 2015. The insurance risk pool continues to operate under the recently launched Pacific Resilience Program or PREP. It is a partnership between Marshall Islands, Samoa, Tonga, Vanuatu, the Pacific Community, the Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat, and the World Bank.
ARC. 2016. African Risk Capacity Strategic Framework 2016-2020. Johannesburg.
ARC. ARC Factsheet. Johannesburg.
ARC. How ARC Works. Johannesburg.
UNFCCC. 2012. A Literature Review on the Topics in the Context of Thematic Area 2 of the Work Programme on Loss and Damage: A Range of Approaches to Address Loss and Damage Associated with the Adverse Effects of Climate Change. Bonn.
UNFCCC. 2016. Information Paper: Best Practices, Challenges and Lessons Learned from Existing Financial Instruments at All Levels that Address the Risk of Loss and Damage Associated with the Adverse Effects of Climate Change. Bonn.
UNFCCC. 2015. Report of the Standing Committee on Finance to the Conference of the Parties. Bonn.
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/World Bank. 2012. FONDEN: Mexico’s Natural Disaster Fund – A Review. Washington, D.C.
World Bank. 2015. Pacific Catastrophe Risk Insurance Pilot. Washington, D.C.
World Bank. 2013. FONDEN: Mexico’s National Disaster Fund: An Evolving Inter-institutional Fund for Post-Disaster Expenditures. Washington, D.C.
World Bank. 2016. Press Release: Pacific Resilience Program Launched. Washington, D.C.
World Bank. 2012. Caribbean Catastrophe Risk Insurance Facility (CCRIF): Pooling Risk to Protect Against Natural Disasters. Washington, D.C.
Explainer: Catastrophe Bonds Explained
Leave your question or comment in the section below:
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
The views expressed on this website are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by using the term “country” in this document, ADB does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.