New Thinking for Fragile States

Children playing on Dili beach, Timor-Leste. Photo credit: ADB.
Children playing on Dili beach, Timor-Leste. Photo credit: ADB.

Despite extensive aid, countries with fragile and conflict-affected situations are generally failing to significantly improve the lives of their people. New thinking is needed.


Statement of Issue

Fragile and conflict-affected situations are generally characterized by political instability, weak governance and institutional capacity, economic and social insecurity, and greater vulnerability to the effects of climate change.

Though the list periodically changes, in 2016 ADB classified the following countries as having fragile and conflict-affected situations: Afghanistan and Myanmar, which are affected by conflict, and the fragile Pacific countries of Kiribati, the Marshall Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia, Nauru, Solomon Islands, Timor-Leste, and Tuvalu. The conclusions and recommendations made are based primarily on the study of these countries.

Fragile and conflict-affected situations countries confront complex and multifaceted issues, and it can be difficult for policy makers to establish which development projects and programs should be prioritized. Despite massive international aid to these countries, they continue to rely heavily on external assistance. This often involves the building and rebuilding of unsustainable infrastructure and the repetitive training of personnel. Development projects and programs designed to improve the transport, energy, education, health, and private sectors in these countries have reaped some benefits but usually only for a short time, and for a small proportion of the population.

Policy Options

The weakest areas in countries with fragile and conflict-affected situations are policies for social inclusion and equity, followed by structural policies, and public sector management and institutions. Economic management is generally the strongest area in many countries with fragile and conflict-affected situations.

Development partners and policy makers need to rethink their approaches and be more innovative when dealing with fragile countries because "business as usual" is not working. This includes increasing knowledge and understanding of the political economy context of each sector when designing development projects and programs. Looking into governance, institutional, political, and social issues, before intervening on infrastructure and technology, might also be necessary. The right policies—customized to the local context—should be in place and core institutions should be strengthened. Otherwise, fragility, conflict, and poverty will continue their vicious cycle.


Policy makers and development organizations should prioritize: mainstreaming gender equality at the local level; strengthening accountability mechanisms for public resource use; increasing investments in health and education; capacity building for environmental institutions; developing an innovative policy framework on land use; and improving regulatory frameworks for trade, finance, and business. These recommendations, geared toward a problem-solving, human-centered approach, focus on improving government services for citizens. They are aimed at strengthening policies for social inclusion/equity and structural policies. Sound structural policies can lead to more effective and efficient governance systems while social inclusion and equity are the foundation of political stability and socioeconomic growth.


ADB. 2016.  Mapping Fragile And Conflict-Affected Situations in Asia and the Pacific: The ADB Experience

OECD. 2015.  States of Fragility.Paris.

S. Hearn. 2016. Independent Review of the New Deal for Engagement in Fragile States for the International Dialogue on Peacebuilding and Statebuilding. New York: Center on International Cooperation, New York University. 

ADB. 2007. Achieving Development Effectiveness in Weakly Performing Countries: The Asian Development Bank’s Approach to Engaging with Weakly Performing Countries. Manila.

ADB. 2012.  Working Differently in Fragile and Conflict-Affected Situations: The ADB Experience. Manila.

ADB. 2013. Operational Plan for Enhancing ADB’s Effectiveness in Fragile and Conflict-Affected Situations. Manila.

Related links

What is a Fragile State?

Working Differently in Fragile and Conflict-Affected Situations


   Last updated: February 2017


Meet the expert

  • Patrick Safran
    Principal Operations Coordination Specialist (Fragile Situations), Pacific Department, ADB

    As focal point for fragile and conflict-affected countries, Mr. Safran supports ADB operations in this context. Previously, he helped developed ADB’s strategic and results-oriented approach to fragile situations; focal point for disaster and emergency assistance; ICT coordinator; and project specialist and focal point for coastal and aquatic resources management. Prior to joining ADB, Mr. Safran was regional manager for Asia-Pacific and Latin America at French agricultural research agency CIRAD. He has PhDs in Agriculture from Tohoku University in Japan and in Natural Sciences from Lille University in France.

    Follow Patrick Safran on


The views expressed in these articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Asian Development Bank, its management, its Board of Directors, or its members.

Was this article useful?