Promoting Gender-Inclusive Growth Through Regional Integration

Regional integration enhances job prospects in manufacturing and services, leading to higher wages and increased demand for women workers. Photo credit: ADB.

Share on:           

Published:

Balanced regional integration boosts women's economic participation, driving gender-inclusive growth and reducing inequality in Sri Lanka.

Introduction

Inequality results in adverse economic, social, and political consequences. In Sri Lanka, improvements in education, fertility, and incomes have not increased women’s labor force participation as seen in advanced economies. Gender equality is a shared vision for social justice. Addressing gender inequality is crucial for stronger and more sustainable development. 

While regional integration is seen as a potential development strategy to promote inclusive and sustainable growth, gender equality is often overlooked.  Identifying and implementing the right policy mix for meaningful regional integration is vital to ensuring gender-inclusive sustainable growth. 

Analysis

The Impact of Economic Opportunities for Women

Expanding economic opportunities for women trigger widespread benefits. In South Asia, equal employment opportunities for men and women could enhance incomes by 25% and increase intraregional trade of $44 billion. Despite progress in education and health outcomes, low women’s economic participation remains a major issue . In 2021, women’s labor force participation was 22%  in South Asia and 32%  in Sri Lanka, while other regions, except the Middle East and North Africa (18%), surpassed 50%. Also, a 27%  gender wage gap indicates that women in Sri Lanka earn about 20% less than men. Achieving gender parity in South Asia will take 149 years, compared to 67 years in Europe and 95 years in North America.

Challenges and Opportunities in Regional Integration

Unlike South Asia, regions like East Asia, Europe, and North America harness the benefits of regional integration by developing strong relationships with their neighbors. Intraregional trade make up 50% of total trade in East Asia and 22% in Sub-Saharan Africa but only 5% in South Asia. In South Asia, intraregional trade accounts for just  1% of regional GDP,  compared to 2.6% in Sub-Saharan Africa and 11% in East Asia and the Pacific.

South Asia’s regional integration is restricted by high tariffs, non-tariff measures, lack of trust and political will, weak policy implementation, and inadequate infrastructure. Deeper regional integration offers benefits like cheaper goods for consumers, better access to inputs, and expanded market access for producers and exporters.

Reforming Regional Integration for Gender-Inclusive Growth

To promote gender-inclusive growth, it is essential to improve the lagging dimensions of regional integration. This process is complex and varies by country due to its multidimensional nature. The six key dimensions are trade and investment, movement of capital, regional value chains, infrastructure and connectivity, people’s mobility, and legal and institutional basis for international policy cooperation.

Balanced progress across these dimensions leads to stronger regional integration and higher women’s economic participation. The EU, with the most evenly distributed dimensions, is the most integrated regions, with more than 50% women’s participation in the workforce.

Figure 1: Heterogeneity in the Contribution of Multiple Dimensions of Regional Integration

NOTE: Regions with the most evenly distributed dimensions have the highest women labor force participation, e.g., the European Union.

SOURCE: C.Y. Park and R. Claveria. 2018. Does Regional Integration Matter for Inclusive Growth? Evidence from the Multidimensional Regional Integration Index. ADB Economics Working Paper Series. No. 559. Asian Development Bank.

 

In contrast, South Asia’s uneven dimensional distribution makes it one of the least integrated and lowest women’s economic participating regions. South Asia prioritizes infrastructure, and connectivity and movement of people, and less on money and finance. Similarly, Sri Lanka has focused heavily on infrastructure, with 60% of public investment directed toward it in recent decades.

Table 1: Identifying Specific Dimensions of Regional Integration Toward Gender-Inclusive Growth

Country Year 2020 Highest Share Lowest Share
Bhutan 0.524 Movement of people Institutional and social integration
Nepal 0.518 Trade and investment Institutional and social integration
India 0.487 Institutional and social integration Trade and investment
Sri Lanka 0.474 Infrastructure and connectivity

Institutional and social integration

Money and finance

Bangladesh 0.415 Money and finance Regional value chains
Pakistan 0.381 Infrastructure and connectivity

Trade and investment

Movement of people

Afghanistan 0.345 Infrastructure and connectivity Institutional and social integration

NOTE: The Multidimensional Regional Integration Index (MDRII) provides a cumulative score across six dimensions: 1) Trade and Investment, 2) Money and Finance, 3) Regional Value Chain, 4) Movement of People, 5) Infrastructure and Connectivity, and 6) Institutional and Social Integration. A higher score indicates better integration. Dimensions with scores below 0.4 require significant reforms to ensure that regional integration promotes gender-inclusive sustainable growth.

Author’s calculations basis:  C.Y. Park and R. Claveria. 2018. Does Regional Integration Matter for Inclusive Growth? Evidence from the Multidimensional Regional Integration Index. ADB Economics Working Paper Series. No. 559. Asian Development Bank.

 

Strengthening institutional and social integration, alongside improvements in money and finance, could reduce gender inequality by nearly 50% in South Asia. Enhanced mobility and institutional and social integration benefit women in industry and services but not in agriculture. In developing countries, women often work in low-skilled, labor-intensive, low-skilled, and low-paid sectors—referred to as the “feminization of labor.” Regional integration can reverse this trend by increasing employment in manufacturing and services, resulting in higher wages and demand for women labor. 

In contrast, trade and integration negatively impact women in agriculture due to limited skills and mobility. Regional integration alters the production structures, where sectors with export potential grow, and import-dependent sectors shrink. Women in shrinking sectors may face job losses, and gender segregation can limit their benefits in growing sectors. Opening specific sectors and providing opportunities for upskilling and reskilling women can mitigate these negative effects. 

Implications

Regional integration is multidimensional and its impacts are country specific. Sri Lanka has yet to fully benefit from regional integration. 

To advance gender-inclusive sustainable growth, balanced progress across all dimensions is essential. Enhancing lagging areas like institutional integration and finance could reduce gender inequality by nearly 50%.

Robust domestic policies that support quality institutions, governance systems, and financial conduct are  crucial to making regional integration a driver of inclusive growth and women’s economic empowerment in Sri Lanka.

Lakmini Fernando
Research Fellow, Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka

Dr. Lakmini Fernando specializes in public finance, development economics, and climate change. She holds a BSc in Agriculture from the University of Peradeniya, a Master of Development Economics (Advanced) from the University of Queensland, Australia, and a PhD in Economics from the University of Adelaide, Australia. She is a recipient of the Australia Awards Scholarship from the Government of Australia and the Adelaide International Scholarship from the University of Adelaide.

Sulochana Silva
Research Assistant, Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka

Sulochana is a research assistant at IPS, specializing in environment, natural resources, and climate change policy research. She holds a BSc Honours degree in Agricultural Technology and Management from the University of Peradeniya and is currently pursuing an MSc in Agricultural Economics at Postgraduate Institute of Agriculture, University of Peradeniya. She has contributed to various research projects in collaboration with organizations, such as IDRC, ICIMOD, RESET, and IPE (Global and Vital Strategies).

Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka

The Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka is an autonomous economic research organization, established by an Act of Parliament, in Colombo. Its mission is to conduct high-quality, independent, policy-relevant research to provide robust evidence for policymaking and improve the lives of all Sri Lankans.

Leave your question or comment in the section below:
Disclaimer

The views expressed on this website are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by using the term “country” in this document, ADB does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.