How to Bring a Soviet-style Economy and Government into the Modern Era
Armenia’s leaders put in place prudent fiscal and monetary policies that resulted in strong economic growth.
Modernizing through reforms
When Armenia gained independence from the Soviet Union in 1991, it faced a mammoth task of transforming the state-run utility system into modern, efficient agencies. The system included the national water and sewerage company and local water agencies throughout the country. In the 1990s, about 60%–80% of the water flowing through the water supply system was lost to leaks or other problems. This water loss problem was more than four times higher than the norm for most cities in Western Europe.
Residents of the capital, Yerevan, and about 95% of those living in other urban areas were connected to the Soviet-era centralized water services. The old system then fell into disrepair from neglect and poor maintenance. Years after independence, only about 15% of the population enjoyed continuous water services.
The people of Armenia needed a modern system to bring clean water into their homes. A billing system was also needed to make the water supply sustainable.
The ADB-supported Water Supply and Sanitation Sector Project helped Armenia upgrade the water supply and sanitation systems in 21 small towns and 97 villages with support from private companies. When the work was done, more than 600,000 people received potable water at least 14 hours a day.
Helping Armenia make the transition from a Soviet-style economy and government to the modern era has been a big part of ADB’s work in the country. Armenia experienced early challenges in making the transition, but by the 2000s, it had turned things around. Armenia’s leaders put in place prudent fiscal and monetary policies, liberal trade and foreign exchange regimes, and improvements in the business regulatory environment. The results were impressive. Economic growth averaged about 12% between 2001 and 2004, and reached almost 14% by 2005.
Partners in Reform
When ADB and Armenia became partners in 2005, there was still much work to be done. ADB focused its assistance on developing the rural areas of the country, promoting the private sector, and encouraging cooperation between Armenia and its neighbors.
When the global financial crisis hit Armenia in the late 2000s, ADB responded with the Crisis Recovery Support Program, which helped mitigate the impact of the crisis by supporting social safety nets that helped keep people from falling back into poverty. The program also provided funding for the government’s expenditures and programs.
Subsequently, ADB returned to regional cooperation, private sector development, and support for the development of Armenia’s urban areas.
This included work on the country’s vital road links to neighboring countries and finance projects to promote women’s businesses. ADB also helped clean up secondary cities in Armenia with improved solid waste management systems, and helped provide clean water and reliable transportation systems.
Since 2005, ADB has invested more than $1 billion in 22 projects and programs designed to drive economic growth, reduce poverty, and improve people’s lives. ADB will continue to help Armenia integrate its economy with others in the region and pursue more resilient, inclusive, and environmentally sustainable growth. Key steps will include improving urban and regional roads; upgrading secondary towns’ water and urban infrastructure; continuing to support women’s entrepreneurship; and enhancing energy security by diversifying energy sources, and rehabilitating and upgrading electricity transmission and distribution networks.
Asian Development Bank (ADB). 2017. Together We Deliver.
ADB. 2017. Armenia: Development Effectiveness Brief.
Policy Brief: How to Improve Road and Water Systems
Leave your question or comment in the section below:
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
The views expressed on this website are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by using the term “country” in this document, ADB does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.