Transforming Health Care Leaders in Papua New Guinea

Papua New Guinea has implemented health care reforms to improve delivery of health services. Photo credit: ADB.

Share on:           

Published:

The Health Executive Leadership Development Program is building capacity for future health directors and better health outcomes.

Overview

The Papua New Guinea health system underwent major decentralization in the mid-2000s, intended to bring the organization of health services closer to the people and improve health outcomes. This change, however, exposed major gaps in leadership capacity. In response, in 2018, the Government of Papua New Guinea initiated a nationwide program of middle management training and in 2023 added the Health Executive Leadership Development Program (HELDP) to target those in senior leadership positions.

A report on the HELDP, drawing on in-depth interviews with program graduates, examines the impact of the program. These include demonstrable improvements in leadership confidence and decision-making, as well as stronger alignment with national health priorities. The report’s findings show that the HELDP has been a transformative investment, and shows how context-specific, practice-based leadership development can strengthen health system performance.

Leadership Vacuum

The typical career trajectory for health system leaders was for chief executive officer (CEO) positions to be filled by physicians who had reached the pinnacle of their clinical careers but lacked the opportunity to acquire the strategic skills of health systems leadership. By the early 2020s, this skills gap was manifesting itself in poorly managed health services, with wide variation in the performance across provinces. Without effective supervision and management, health facilities were operating at suboptimal levels due to lack of appropriate staffing and medical supplies. There has also been a significant gender imbalance in the health system senior leadership in Papua New Guinea, with low number of women in key leadership and decision-making roles at all levels.

Tailored Leadership Training

In 2018, the Papua New Guinea government approved funding for middle management and executive leadership training as part of the Health Services Sector Development Program, a wider health systems strengthening effort to expand and improve rural health services. By late 2025, the program had trained health system managers in every province—more than 1,300 graduates—most of whom had not previously received any formal management or supervisory training.

Under the HELDP in 2023, training was delivered to health directors via intensive residencies in a face-to-face, problem-based learning modality, culminating in an overseas study tour. The program was demanding: it took directors away from their workplace for 2 weeks at a time. Trainees worked in groups that required them to put aside their status within their organizations and work with each other as equal collaborators, crucial to breaking down the siloed approach to management that has been holding back the health system.

For some of the senior clinicians, who are used to being the person to whom everyone looked for instructions, this was a challenging and humbling experience. On the other hand, those used to staying quiet were empowered to find their voice and actively participate. All graduates were required to work on a final project that would bring about change in their work setting.

Figure 1: The Health Executive Leadership Training Program

Click on image to enlarge. 
Source: Asian Development Bank.

Program Impact

By late 2025, HELDP had trained over 110 executives. Data gathered through interviews with 32 HELDP graduates, facilitators, and other stakeholders revealed that the training had been transformative for the graduates. Their managers described visibly improved leadership confidence, decision-making, and organizational performance. At an institutional level, there was evidence of better coordination and stronger alignment with national health strategies.

Graduates reported being better listeners, more solutions-focused, and better equipped to handle conflict resolution. Several graduates have moved into more senior positions, attributing their success to the training they received, which gave them the confidence to go for a promotion and helped them stand out and excel in the interview. This was particularly the case for some of the women who graduated from the training. They returned to their workplaces resolved to advocate for themselves and their ideas, and to be a role model for women in more junior positions.

Several graduates have initiated service delivery improvements at the health facilities they oversee, improved data use in planning, and enhanced team management and communication in their provinces. Both the clinical staff and the corporate and support services graduates have a greater appreciation for the work of the other, and a new recognition that they are all on the same team playing crucial roles in patient care, even when they are not patient-facing.

The program is expensive, though. It costs about $17,000 per graduate, in large part due to air transportation from the provinces to the capital and overseas. Graduates pointed out that the course sent them back better equipped to run their health system more efficiently, make better use of their existing resources, and support the aim of a healthier population, all of which have a financial benefit. Also, the study tour enabled them to see highly aspirational practices, such as robotics in a pharmacy in Singapore, and tools that they could immediately implement back home, such as clinical governance processes seen in Australia.

However, not everyone found fertile ground for the new ideas they came back with and their enthusiasm for change fell afoul of others’ unwillingness to change. Some graduates lacked support when they tried to implement in their provinces the change management projects they designed during the course because of resistance or opposition from their provincial health CEOs. This was less common in settings where there was a supportive CEO and where there was critical mass of HELDP graduates, who could then drive an agenda of strategic vision and change.

Recommendations

Double the number of HELDP graduates. Although there is no magic formula to determine the critical mass of graduates needed within a single organization to transform its leadership, graduates have found that the impact of their individual training is greater than the sum of its parts when they work together with fellow graduates.

Provide training to the provincial health CEOs. A bespoke leadership training program for CEOs, pitched at a more strategic level and run over a shorter time (such as a period of 3 weeks), could reinforce the impact of the HELDP.

Build domestic capacity to deliver leadership training. Institutionalizing HELDP within a university, as a recognized postgraduate qualification, and a pathway to an in-house postgraduate diploma or master’s degree would promote sustainability.

Support additional online learning. While the face-to-face, intensive and residential modality, combined with overseas exposure, is unique and highly effective, this training could be augmented with online programming if trainees were supported to access better online connectivity.

Foster intra-provincial mentorship. This could be in the form of a rotational program, for example, with graduates coming in to understudy CEOs around the country.

Inez Mikkelsen-Lopez
Inez K. Mikkelsen-Lopez, Senior Health Specialist, Human and Social Development Office, Sectors Department 3, Asian Development Bank

Inez is a public health specialist with a focus on strengthening health systems in low-income settings. Prior to joining ADB, she was a monitoring and evaluation advisor for a health program in Papua New Guinea funded by the Government of Australia. She started her career at the World Bank and has field experience in Madagascar, Papua New Guinea, Tanzania, and Thailand.

Jane Parry
Consultant, Sectors Department 3, Asian Development Bank

Jane is a health and development analyst and writer. She works with teams across ADB and has extensive consulting experience with UN system agencies, international nongovernmental organizations, and the private sector. She holds academic positions with three universities in Hong Kong, China, where her research focuses on poverty and health, particularly in Asia and the Pacific.

Asian Development Bank (ADB)

The Asian Development Bank is a leading multilateral development bank supporting sustainable, inclusive, and resilient growth across Asia and the Pacific. Working with its members and partners to solve complex challenges together, ADB harnesses innovative financial tools and strategic partnerships to transform lives, build quality infrastructure, and safeguard our planet. Founded in 1966, ADB is owned by 69 members—49 from the region.

Follow Asian Development Bank (ADB) on
Leave your question or comment in the section below:
Disclaimer

The views expressed on this website are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by using the term “country” in this document, ADB does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.