Tracing the True Drivers of Transport Emissions

Nearly 66% of total demand for transport services originates from the production activities of other economic sectors. Photo credit: ADB.

Share on:           

Published:

Transport emissions are the shared outcome of global production and consumption—demanding accountability across sectors and regions.

Introduction

As a critical pillar of global trade and mobility, the transport sector plays a pivotal role in driving global greenhouse gas emissions. Emissions inventories show that transport generated 8.3 GtCO₂e (gigatons of carbon dioxide) in 2023—about 16% of total global emissions—representing a 78% rise since 1990. When measured using the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting (SEEA), which attributes emissions to the producers of transport services, rather than where they physically occur, the sector accounted for 6% of the global total emissions. This distinction between inventory-based and production-based accounts helps clarify where emissions occur versus who drives them through economic activity.

Correctly attributing transport emissions is critical because the sector primarily operates in response to the needs of other industries. Demand in one sector often cascades into emissions elsewhere: for instance, increased demand for automobiles requires the transport of raw materials such as steel and aluminum to manufacturing plants, followed by the movement of finished vehicles to distributors. Although inventories attribute these emissions to the transport sector, they are in fact driven by demand from manufacturing.

Capturing the full extent of transport’s demand-driven emissions requires analytical tools that can trace how demand in one sector generates transport emissions across the entire economy. The Asian Development Banks’ Environmentally Extended Multiregional Input–Output Tables bridge this gap by linking emissions to economic output across sectors and regions, thereby revealing the true drivers of transport-related emissions.

Transport Emissions as Shared Responsibility

Transport is essential for connecting industries to raw materials, production sites, and final consumers. Almost every sector relies on transport to move intermediate and final goods, often across multiple borders. This means that transport emissions in one region may be generated in response to consumption or production taking place elsewhere.

Decarbonization strategies should therefore extend beyond the transport sector, focusing on the sectors and regions that create the demand for transport services. Targeting these drivers can unlock broader and possibly more cost-effective reductions in emissions.

The Environmentally Extended Multiregional Input–Output Tables provide a practical approach to uncover these linkages. By integrating environmental accounts with core multiregional input–output tables, they trace not only the direct emissions of each sector but also the indirect emissions embedded in the inputs they consume. In the transport sector context, this approach captures demand-driven emissions or the indirect (Scope 3) emissions that result from each sector’s use of transport services. Transport emissions therefore are attributed not only to where they occur but also to the industries and regions generating demand.

Building on this framework, the Leontief model may be used with the Environmentally Extended Multiregional Input–Output Tables to quantify the emissions embodied in both the production and consumption of goods and services. Applied to transport, this model quantifies demand-driven emissions by region and economic sector—showing shared responsibility for these emissions across the production system.

Tracing Transport Emissions Across Industries

From a sectoral perspective, transport supports nearly all economic activity. Beyond the emissions generated by the sector’s own operations, demand from other sectors accounts for almost two-thirds of total transport emissions. Manufacturing and services each contribute about 32% of transport-related emissions, followed by construction (17%) (Figure 1)[1].

Figure 1: Transport-Generated Emissions by Transport Subsectors (Exporting Sectors) Arising from Demand of Other Economic Sectors (Importing Sectors), 2023 (GgCO₂e)

Source: Authors’ analysis using ADB’s Environmentally Extended Multiregional Input–Output Tables. 

The scale of these contributions reflects transport’s central role in sustaining production and services. Manufacturing depends on logistics networks to move raw materials, components, and intermediate goods. In services, emissions are largely driven by public administration and defense, and trade—all of which depend on transportation as the backbone of their operations. Construction projects also rely heavily on transport for moving equipment and materials, where delays or inefficiencies can amplify both costs and emissions across supply chains.

Asia and the Pacific as the Epicenter of Transport Emissions

Regional analysis of transport emissions driven by demand from all other sectors identifies Asia and the Pacific as the largest contributor, accounting for nearly half (48%) of global transport-related emissions. Even when domestic demand is excluded, the region still leads with a 36% share of emissions arising from demand for its transport services (Figure 2)[2].

Figure 2. Transport-Generated Emissions by Exporting regions and importing regions, 2023 (GgCO₂e) 

Source: Authors’ analysis using ADB’s Environmentally Extended Multiregional Input–Output Tables. 

This pattern underscores Asia’s role as the world’s production hub, where energy-intensive manufacturing, rapid urbanization, and growing freight activity drive heavy reliance on transport. Emissions from its transport service exports now surpass those from imports, reflecting the region’s industrial base serving global demand, fueled by lower labor costs, economies of scale, and specialized inputs. Advances in transport and logistics have weakened the link between production and the physical location of inputs, expanding markets, encouraging cross-border supply chains, and enabling a relocation of manufacturing activities toward economies with comparative advantage. Ultimately, decarbonizing transport demands shared responsibility and coordinated action across regions.

Decarbonizing Transport

To meet net-zero goals, transport cannot be treated in isolation. The sector’s emissions are influenced not only by the energy used in vehicles but also by the economic activities that depend on them. Long-distance freight, energy-intensive manufacturing, and expanding urban demand all reinforce transport’s role as a major source of emissions, highlighting the need for a coordinated and cross-sectoral approach.

Analysis using the Environmentally Extended Multiregional Input–Output Tables shows interdependencies across global value chains, tracing how transport connects sectors and regions. It shows that decarbonization strategies can extend beyond improving transport technologies, infrastructure, and user habits to also consider the sectors whose demand drives transport emissions. In Asia, aligning trade, industry, and construction policies with transport decarbonization efforts—while strengthening monitoring systems and integrating environmental criteria into supply chain management—can help achieve sustainable, low-carbon growth.


[1] Values are calculated using the Environmentally Extended Multiregional Input–Output Tables, which link emissions inventories (classified under IPCC categories) to corresponding economic sectors. Emission intensities were first derived by dividing transport-related emissions (civil aviation, road transportation excluding resuspension, railways, water-borne navigation, and other transportation) by sectoral economic output from the ADB MRIO. Using the Leontief model, total emissions were then expressed as a function of final demand and intersectoral linkages, captured through the Leontief inverse. From this framework, the transport sector rows (inland, water and air transport, and supporting activities) were isolated to estimate how much of their emissions were attributable to demand from all other economic sectors. To emphasize these cross-sectoral linkages, the figure excludes emissions driven by the transport sector’s own demand.

[2] Values for Figure 2 are calculated using the same methodology as Figure 1. To emphasize the cross-regional linkages, the figure excludes emissions driven by each region's own demand of transport services.

Resources

Asian Development Bank. 2025. Environmentally Extended Multiregional Input-Output Tables (Air Emissions). accessed October 2025.

ADB. 2025. Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific 2025.

A. Grant. 2025. Asia's Rise in Manufacturing: Shaping a New Global Era. Jackson Grant Executive.

E. Miller and P. Blair. 2022. Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions. 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press.

H. Haralambides. 2017. Globalization, Public Sector Reform, and the Role of Ports in International Supply Chains. Maritime Economics & Logistics. 19 (1). pp. 1–51.

M. Crippa et al. 2025. GHG Emissions of All World Countries 2025 Report. Publications Office of the European Union.

P. Felipe. 2018. Asia’s Industrial Transformation: The Role of Manufacturing and Global Value Chains (Part 1). ADB Economics Working Paper Series. No. 549. Asian Development Bank.

Mahinthan Joseph Mariasingham
Principal Statistician, Economic Research and Development Impact Department, Asian Development Bank

Joseph Mariasingham works in the Data Division and leads data development and statistical capacity-building initiatives in the System of National Accounts (SNA), global value chains, and statistical business registers. He started his career at Statistics Canada in 1999 and has specialized in SNA and input-output economics. He has considerable experience producing critical data and analysis for evidence-based policymaking.

Follow Mahinthan Joseph Mariasingham on

Arushi Gupta
Consultant, Asian Development Bank

Arushi Gupta works with ADB’s data division where she supports statistical capacity development across developing member economies. She specializes in economic research in the areas of System of National Accounts and System of Environmental-Economic Accounting. She holds a master’s degree in international economics from the Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics, India.

Follow Arushi Gupta on

Aparajita Pandharkar
Consultant, Asian Development Bank

Aparajita is a senior statistical researcher. She has experience working on national accounts, big data (AIS), and survey data sourced from conducting field research in developing economies. She holds an MSc in development economics from the LSE and a BA (H) in economics from Delhi University.

Follow Aparajita Pandharkar on

Asian Development Bank (ADB)

The Asian Development Bank is a leading multilateral development bank supporting sustainable, inclusive, and resilient growth across Asia and the Pacific. Working with its members and partners to solve complex challenges together, ADB harnesses innovative financial tools and strategic partnerships to transform lives, build quality infrastructure, and safeguard our planet. Founded in 1966, ADB is owned by 69 members—49 from the region.

Follow Asian Development Bank (ADB) on
Leave your question or comment in the section below:
Disclaimer

The views expressed on this website are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by using the term “country” in this document, ADB does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.